Right to counsel - quarantine
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
An individual who is subject to a petition for confinement for infectious tuberculosis has the right to be represented by adversary counsel. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 252.07(9)(d). The statute adds that "At the time of the filing of the petition, the court shall assure that the individual... is represented by adversary counsel", and "If the individual claims or appears to be indigent," the court must refer the parent to indigency determinations under Wis. Stat. Ann. § 977.07(1).
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: no