Right to counsel - quarantine
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
An individual who is subject to a petition for confinement for infectious tuberculosis has the right to be represented by adversary counsel. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 252.07(9)(d). “At the time of the filing of the petition the court shall assure that the individual ... is represented by adversary counsel” and “[i]f the individual claims or appears to be indigent, the court shall refer the individual to the authority for indigency determinations under § 977.07(1).”
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: no