Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
In any proceeding involving the involuntary quarantining of a person allegedly infected with a communicable disease, the person has a right to counsel, “who may be the public defender or his or her deputy.” Nev. Stat. § 441A.660(1). Appointed counsel’s fees “must be charged against the estate of the person for whom the counsel was appointed or, if the person is indigent, against the county in which the application for involuntary court-ordered isolation or quarantine was filed.” § 441A.660(2). However, “if the person for whom counsel was appointed is challenging his or her isolation or quarantine or any condition of such isolation or quarantine and . . . succeeds in [the] challenge,” appointed counsel’s fees “must be charged against the county in which the application for involuntary court-ordered isolation or quarantine was filed.” Id.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: no