Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Legislation, Guardianship/Conservatorship of Adults - Ward
Pursuant to the Massachusetts Uniform Probate Code, after filing a petition for appointment of a guardian, conservator or other protective order, if the ward, incapacitated person, or person to be protected or someone on his or her behalf requests appointment of counsel, or if the court determines that the interests of the ward, incapacitated person, or person to be protected are or may be inadequately represented, "the court shall appoint an attorney to represent the person, giving consideration to the choice of the person if fourteen or more years of age." M.G.L. ch. 190B, § 5-106.
M.G.L. ch. 190B, § 5-311(c) specifies that the court is to follow the same procedures for termination of guardianship as for establishment, so presumably the right to counsel applies as well.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: no