Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
There is a right to counsel if a person is to be isolated/quarantined due to tuberculosis. Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 36-726(H).
There is also a right to counsel if a person is to be isolated/quarantined during an emergency/war. Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 36-789(M) ("The court shall appoint counsel at state expense to represent a person or group of persons who is subject to isolation or quarantine pursuant to (Article 9, Chapter 6 of Title 36) and who is not otherwise represented by counsel. Representation by counsel continues throughout the duration of the isolation or quarantine of the person or group of persons.")
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: no