Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Legislation, Guardianship/Conservatorship of Adults - Ward
Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 3-1-205(a) states that “The proposed ward of any involuntary petition for guardianship or conservatorship shall have the right to: (iv) … have counsel appointed upon order of the court …” It is unclear whether this confers a right or whether the court has discretion to choose whether to order such appointment, but it appears to be the latter given that the statute also provides for appointment of a guardian ad litem without the "upon order of the court" qualifying language.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: discretionary Qualified: no