Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Legislation, Abuse/Neglect/Dependency - Accused Parents
Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-425 provides that in abuse/neglect proceedings:
(1) Any party involved in a petition filed pursuant to 41-3-422 has the right to counsel in all proceedings held pursuant to the petition.
(2) Except as provided in subsections (3) and (4), the court shall immediately appoint the office of state public defender to assign counsel for:
(a) any indigent parent, guardian, or other person having legal custody of a child or youth in a removal, placement, or termination proceeding pursuant to 41-3-422, pending a determination of eligibility pursuant to 47-1-111.
A 2017 amendment to § 41-3-425(5) added that putative fathers must be successfully served and request appointment of counsel before counsel can be appointed, while an amendment to § 41-3-112 specifies that where a court-appointed special advocate is not available to serve as guardian ad litem for the child, the court can appoint an attorney as GAL.
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(c) permits the court to appoint the public defender for the appeal.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: no