Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing
appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a
statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court
decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes
precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is
discretionary).
Legislation, Incarceration for Fees/Fines (incomplete)
Md. Code Crim. Proc. § 16-204(b)(1)(iv) specifies that an indigent defendant shall be provided representation by the Public Defender in "any [] proceeding in which confinement under a judicial commitment of an individual in a public or private institution may result."
Md. Rules R. 15-206(3) provides some guidance on how waiver of the right to counsel should be handled.
If "yes",
the established right to counsel or
discretionary appointment of counsel
is
limited
in some way, including any of: the only authority
is a
lower/intermediate court decision or a city council,
not a high court or state legislature; there
has been
a subsequent case that
has
cast doubt; a statute
is
ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment
is not
for all types of individuals or proceedings
within that category.
categorical
yes
